Player Reports Confiscated Funds Of $700K At PartyPoker

Gamblers Daily Digest -

In recent weeks, the online poker community has been abuzz with discussions surrounding a controversial incident centered on PartyPoker, a prominent name in the online poker arena. What began as a routine gaming session on the platform quickly escalated into a heated dispute, raising serious questions about player rights, platform accountability, and the security of funds in online gambling environments.

As players logged on to participate in their favorite games and tournaments, they were met with shocking reports of confiscated funds totaling a staggering $700,000. The source of this upheaval? Allegations of a document “error” that led to the freezing and subsequent seizure of winnings by PartyPoker. 

This unexpected turn of events has sent shockwaves through the online poker community, prompting widespread scrutiny and calls for transparency from platform operators. As players demand answers and accountability, the stage is set for a high-stakes showdown between the interests of online poker enthusiasts and the responsibilities of industry leaders like PartyPoker.

Details of player-confiscated funds of more than $700,000

On February 6, a user known as “Exodus944” on the popular online poker forum 2+2 shared a troubling account of his experience with PartyPoker, shedding light on a significant incident that has reverberated throughout the online gaming community. 

This poker player detailed how PartyPoker confiscated over $700,000 in winnings from his account, marking one of the largest confiscations in recent memory. According to his post on the “News, Views, and Gossip” forum, the user alleged that PartyPoker, owned by Entain, seized his winnings following a million-dollar jackpot win in a $100 Spins game. 

He claimed that the platform arbitrarily confiscated his funds, citing a breach of terms and conditions related to the submission of allegedly forged documents. Despite providing documentation to verify his residency in an authorized country, the user discovered that PartyPoker deemed the documents invalid. 

Despite repeated requests for clarification and evidence from the user, PartyPoker purportedly failed to offer satisfactory explanations for their actions, sparking outrage and raising concerns within the online poker community.

PartyPoker, in response to the allegations, acknowledged the incident but attributed it to an “error” in the verification process. The platform assured players that steps were being taken to rectify the situation and that affected individuals would be compensated accordingly. 

However, the lack of transparency surrounding the nature of the error and the criteria for fund confiscation has left many players uneasy. The incident has reignited concerns about the vulnerability of players’ funds on online poker platforms and the need for greater accountability from operators. 

While PartyPoker has promised to review its verification procedures to prevent similar incidents in the future, players are calling for more transparency and clarity regarding fund seizure protocols. The response to Exodus944’s account has been mixed within the online poker community. 

While some users have voiced sympathy for the original poster and criticized PartyPoker’s handling of the situation, others have raised concerns about potential fraud or misconduct on the part of the player. There are speculations about the possibility of the player using a VPN to access the platform from a restricted country or submitting forged documents. 

One reader highlighted the dilemma faced by the player, acknowledging that using a fake document puts them in a difficult position. However, they criticized PartyPoker for initially accepting the document, benefiting from the player’s deposits, and only contesting its validity after a significant win, questioning the fairness of such actions.

More details of the case emerge

The original poster, hailing from Romania and now residing in Ireland, shared his experience as a dedicated Spins grinder on PartyPoker, affiliated with Team 651. In July 2021, following his relocation, he was required to provide documentation verifying his new address. 

However, in a crucial oversight, he mistakenly submitted an electricity bill from a friend’s residence, albeit in his own name. Despite the questionable authenticity of the document, PartyPoker accepted it. His fortunes took a remarkable turn on October 5, 2022, when he secured a staggering $1 million jackpot prize in a $100 Spins game. 

Encouraged by his success, he decided to scale back his online poker activities and focus on live games while gradually withdrawing his winnings. By February 2023, he had effectively cashed out $300,000, leaving a substantial balance of approximately $707,000 in his account.

Despite his frantic attempts to communicate with PartyPoker and its affiliates, he was met with an unsettling silence. It wasn’t until four months later that he received a belated email response. Exodus 944 alleged that PartyPoker initially indicated they would release his balance upon the submission of updated documentation, a request he promptly fulfilled.

 However, to his dismay, the room reneged on this assurance. Moreover, he claimed that PartyPoker presented him with a proposed settlement, agreeing to release his funds minus $100,000—an offer he reluctantly agreed to, only to have it revoked later on.

Instances of online poker platforms confiscating substantial winnings have been recorded throughout the industry’s history. In a notable case dating back to 2007, PokerStars encountered controversy when the champion of the WCOOP Main Event was disqualified. 

Evidence suggested that the tournament was played by the sibling of the account holder. Despite amassing winnings exceeding a million dollars, the accused account holder was dethroned, resulting in the redistributions of prize money among other players.

In a similar vein, a notable incident occurred in 2011 on PokerStars involving a Dutch player who secured a sixth-place finish in a special edition of the Sunday Million, netting over half a million dollars in winnings. 

However, subsequent investigations revealed that the player was underage at the time of participation, leading to the forfeiture of their $518,000 prize. Interestingly, PokerStars opted to redirect these funds to charitable causes, as reported by

In a more recent example, Gordon Vayo, a prominent online poker player and the runner-up in the 2016 World Series of Poker (WSOP), found himself embroiled in controversy. Following his victory in the Spring Championship of Online Poker (SCOOP) 2017 event on PokerStars, where he claimed $692,000 in winnings, Vayo’s windfall was nullified when it was revealed that he had used a Virtual Private Network (VPN) to mask his location from the United States, where online poker was restricted.

Final Thoughts

The recent controversy surrounding PartyPoker’s confiscation of over $700,000 in player winnings has shed light on the complexities and challenges of the online poker landscape. While PartyPoker has attributed the incident to an “error” in the verification process, the lack of transparency and clarity surrounding the criteria for fund confiscation has left many players uneasy. 

This incident underscores the need for greater accountability and transparency from online poker operators, as well as heightened awareness among players regarding platform regulations and geographic restrictions.

Author: Bryan Cook